With the development of our society, it’s much harder to satisfy the cultural needs of residents. In this social context, China has made all kinds of politics to enrich people’s cultural life. One of these is the free admission to museums, which is thought highly of by us and becomes popular quickly. However, as many people are expressing their support for this idea, there are some people worrying about the disadvantages it brings.
As is known to us, museums are places for people to grow in knowledge and broaden their horizon, as well as an important platform to display human civilization, spread the traditional culture and enhance the patriotic consciousness. Thus, we cannot emphasize the importance of visiting museums too much. From another point of view, not only has high ticket price resulted in the waste of public cultural resources, but also done harm to the promotion of culture and the spread of knowledge. Free admission to museums solves these problems perfectly.
However, there is no denying that this politic brings some disadvantages when we get benefits from it. How to balance the relationship between the management and improve the service is always testing the wisdom and courage of the decision makers. For example, after some museums announced this news, the number of daily visitors came to tens of thousands, with a phenomenon of blowout. This has not only affected the mood of tourists, but also is a threat to the protection of cultural relics.
In my opinion, free admission to museums is an important decision for the country to share the cultural heritage in the new situation. But at the same time, we need to reflect on that does the thought of “one size fits all ” make the idea more like a false scenery? Fortunately, the relevant departments have started to establish a quality assessment system, to further improve the supporting measures. I hope that they can find problems in time and improve the management level and service capabilities, so that the free admission to museums is really conducive to the public.
With the development of our society, it’s much harder to satisfy the cultural needs of residents. In this social context, China has made all kinds of politics to enrich people’s cultural life. One of these is the free admission to museums, which is thought highly of by us and becomes popular quickly. However, as many people are expressing their support for this idea, there are some people worrying about the disadvantages it brings.
As is known to us, museums are places for people to grow in knowledge and broaden their horizon, as well as an important platform to display human civilization, spread the traditional culture and enhance the patriotic consciousness. Thus, we cannot emphasize the importance of visiting museums too much. From another point of view, not only has high ticket price resulted in the waste of public cultural resources, but also done harm to the promotion of culture and the spread of knowledge. Free admission to museums solves these problems perfectly.
However, there is no denying that this politic brings some disadvantages when we get benefits from it. How to balance the relationship between the management and improve the service is always testing the wisdom and courage of the decision makers. For example, after some museums announced this news, the number of daily visitors came to tens of thousands, with a phenomenon of blowout. This has not only affected the mood of tourists, but also is a threat to the protection of cultural relics.
In my opinion, free admission to museums is an important decision for the country to share the cultural heritage in the new situation. But at the same time, we need to reflect on that does the thought of “one size fits all ” make the idea more like a false scenery? Fortunately, the relevant departments have started to establish a quality assessment system, to further improve the supporting measures. I hope that they can find problems in time and improve the management level and service capabilities, so that the free admission to museums is really conducive to the public.